Edinburgh Sean Bell abuse: Council receives seven compensation claims from victims of predatory social worker

Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now
Freedom of Information request reveals seven applications to redress scheme for those targeted by social worker Sean Bell

Edinburgh City Council has received seven compensation claims from victims of a former employee who was a prolific abuser.

A redress scheme to help give those who suffered at the hands of Sean Bell “a level of closure” closed in September after inviting applications.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Bell, who was a senior social worker, was set to stand trial for criminal charges spanning his 30-year career in the council when he was found dead at the bottom of Salisbury Crags in 2020. Victims described him as a “predatory, controlling, serial abuser” who harmed people “sexually, physically, emotionally and psychologically”.

Edinburgh council has received seven compensation claims from victims of 'predatory' social worker Sean Bell.  Picture: Neil HannaEdinburgh council has received seven compensation claims from victims of 'predatory' social worker Sean Bell.  Picture: Neil Hanna
Edinburgh council has received seven compensation claims from victims of 'predatory' social worker Sean Bell. Picture: Neil Hanna

Following his death an independent inquiry found he was protected by an “old boys network” at Edinburgh City Council. Interviews with over 50 witnesses and analysis of over 70,000 emails revealed he was as “lecherous” and “predatory” in his attitude towards female colleagues.

A freedom of information request revealed seven claims were made under a redress scheme established for his victims in the wake of the scandal. The council has set aside £1.5 million to compensate survivors. Claimants were deemed to be eligible if administrators Pinsent Masons were “satisfied on the balance of probabilities” that they suffered “relevant abuse”.

However, previously the council was criticised for the terms of the scheme being too “narrow”. Council whistleblower Christine Scott said last year it should have been extended “to include all victims, not just in the Sean Bell case” after some who suffered found they were not eligible.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

She claimed one person had been denied compensation because they hadn’t been personally physically or sexually assaulted by Bell, adding: “Their definition of abuse is way back to the 1970s. There are other forms of abuse that certainly whistleblowers have been on the receiving end of.”